To use, or not to use?
That is the question.
I’m a big A.W. Tozer fan. I’ve read many of his books over the years and much of my spiritual growth as a younger Christian was due to his writings. But he did strongly speak out against the use of drama in church, calling it a “violation of sincerity,” among other things.
Drama, of course, is not a substitute for the Word of God, and it could never replace the preaching of God’s Word. But it can be a tool…
- used to prepare people mentally (“touch hearts,” as we say) for the upcoming sermon.
- that can present a truth (which I may already know) in a unique and memorable way.
- that can present a conflict, pose a question, or create an effect that will be developed or “solved” by God’s Word.
- which can illustrate truth in a powerful way that can encourage change.
Not an exhaustive list, I’m sure.
There are obvious challenges to using drama. After all, no one really knows what Joseph’s coat of many colors looked exactly like or what Peter’s precise hair length was. But (and maybe you’ve noticed this) when we read and hear the biblical accounts of true stories, our minds tend to “fill in the blanks,” based on our own perceptions. I feel as though drama is just an extension of that imagination, if you will. It puts flesh on those things that we think about.
And I think most people understand that. I mean, do you feel duped when you attend a dramatic program? No. You realize it’s a tool to send a message.
I’m all for drama as part of church services. What say you?
No related posts.